Cursor 8/10
The default pick for IDE-based developers — multi-file agent edits across a large codebase feel the most natural, with near-zero ramp on top of VS Code.
Comparison
How Cursor and Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) compare for AI coding — side by side on the facts, with a clear steer on which suits your workflow.
| Dimension | Cursor | Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) |
|---|---|---|
| Form factor | IDE | IDE · Extension |
| Underlying models | Claude, GPT, Gemini, Cursor models | Claude, GPT, Gemini, SWE-1 |
| Free tier | Yes | Yes |
| Paid from | From ~$20/mo | From ~$20/mo |
| Agent capability (documented) | Very high (5/5) | Very high (5/5) |
| MCP / extensions | Yes | Yes |
| Learning curve | Easy | Easy |
| Best for | Full-time developers who live in an IDE; Large existing codebases | Developers who want an agent-first IDE flow; Managing local + cloud coding agents from one surface |
| Our score | 8/10 | 7/10 |
| Last tested | 2026-06-18 | 2026-06-18 |
Facts compiled from public sources — pricing and models change often, so
confirm current details on each vendor’s site. “Agent capability” reflects documented capability,
not our hands-on score. Vendor links are unpaid (rel="nofollow") unless an affiliate
program is disclosed.
Our take
The default pick for IDE-based developers — multi-file agent edits across a large codebase feel the most natural, with near-zero ramp on top of VS Code.
An agent-first IDE — the Devin Local agent flow is smooth; it sits in the same tier as Cursor, so it comes down to personal feel.
01 / How to choose
03 / FAQ